<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technicalities &#187; SF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sirena.org.uk/log/tag/sf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sirena.org.uk/log</link>
	<description>Just another random blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:41:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EIFF 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.sirena.org.uk/log/2009/07/11/eiff-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sirena.org.uk/log/2009/07/11/eiff-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EIFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planet Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sirena.org.uk/log/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Edinburgh Film Festival finished a couple of weeks ago. As ever, I went along and saw a bunch of films and stage interviews. The programme had been a little disappointing, mostly due to feeling a little constricted &#8211; some things that are usually present were dropped (Mirrorball being the most obvious example) and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Edinburgh Film Festival finished a couple of weeks ago. As ever, I went along and saw a bunch of films and stage interviews. The programme had been a little disappointing, mostly due to feeling a little constricted &#8211; some things that are usually present were dropped (Mirrorball being the most obvious example) and the late night movies weren&#8217;t very late night, starting about 10:30 for the most part. That said, it was a lot of fun &#8211; I was more successful than normal in avoiding duds and there were several things that really stood out.</p>
<p>Two films I saw early on that really stood out were Moon and Exam, two low budget indie science fiction films. Moon has had an awful lot of publicity already so I won&#8217;t repeat what other people have said about it. <a href="http://www.edfilmfest.org.uk/whats-on/2009/exam">Exam</a> is a very tight, taut thriller &#8211; eight people in a room in the final test of a long interview process, one of whom will get the job. Both films looked great &#8211; a testament to how affordable good CGI has become. I&#8217;ll be interested to see what follows them now there&#8217;s some examples of low budget SF out there, and I&#8217;m not sure what to make of the fact that both of the films were British.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsGPsbAd7Dc">Pontypool </a>was also excellent, a zombie movie about the dangers, or possibily salvation, of talk radio. If you see it (which you should) make sure you stay for the end of the credits.</p>
<p>Also good was <a href="http://www.modernloveisautomatic.com">Modern Love is Automatic</a>. It&#8217;s a low budget indie flick which reminded me an awful lot of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100842/">The Unbelievable Truth</a> partly in terms of visual design but more in the way it decided to just jump off and handle things in a totally non-naturalistic fashion. It&#8217;s a really tricky thing to pull off without looking like you just don&#8217;t care about the audience (witness a lot of &#8220;experimental&#8221; films) but it&#8217;s very impressive when it works and it worked here.</p>
<p>On the down side Dario Argento&#8217;s Giallo had the audience laughing, and I&#8217;m fairly sure it was an at laugh rather than a with laugh. There came a point in the film where it felt like they&#8217;d just run out of enthusiasm for the whole thing and were just throwing anything on the screen to tie up the loose ends. Very disappointing at a film festival. That was the only real blip, though &#8211; overall it was good though there was cost cutting in evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sirena.org.uk/log/2009/07/11/eiff-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

